The America First Policy Institute (AFPI) has released a report warning about the potential threats to privacy and freedom associated with the introduction of a Central Bank Digital Currency (CBDC) by the Federal Reserve. The report highlights concerns about the government having unprecedented access to citizens’ financial transactions, as well as the potential for selective exclusion of certain groups from the financial system. It also questions the Federal Reserve’s ability to effectively implement a CBDC, given recent failures in inflation management and bank crashes. The report concludes by urging Congress to establish clear boundaries and restrictions on the Federal Reserve’s authority to issue a digital currency. This report aligns with the sentiments expressed by U.S. congressman Warren Davidson and presidential hopefuls Vivek Ramaswamy, Robert F. Kennedy Jr., and Ron DeSantis, who have also voiced concerns about the threats posed by CBDCs to individual freedoms.
AFPI: A CBDC ‘Would Represent the Greatest Threat to What Little Financial Privacy and Data Security Americans Enjoy’
The America First Policy Institute (AFPI) recently released a report highlighting the potential dangers associated with the implementation of a central bank digital currency (CBDC) by the Federal Reserve. Authored by Michael Faulkender and David Vasquez, the report emphasizes the risks posed to financial privacy and data security in the United States.
Learn more about Bitcoin by clicking here and reading these articles.
Privacy Concerns
One of the primary concerns raised by AFPI is the government’s access to financial transactions if a CBDC is introduced. The direct issuance of a digital dollar by the Federal Reserve could grant unparalleled access to citizens’ transaction data, undermining their privacy. The recent data exposures by the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) serve as evidence that federal agencies might not possess the necessary capabilities to handle Americans’ transaction data securely.
Furthermore, the AFPI report warns that a CBDC could enable authorities to selectively ostracize certain groups from the financial system. The covert Operation Choke Point, implemented during the Obama administration, serves as an example of this potential abuse of power. Financial institutions were pressured to sever ties with entities like payday lenders and gun dealers. The secrecy surrounding the operation and the false denials by high-level officials illustrate the dangers of granting the federal government full authority to bypass the law and potentially censor Americans’ financial privacy and assets.
Operation Choke Point
Operation Choke Point, as mentioned in the previous section, was a covert operation aimed at limiting the banking access of certain industries. It was conducted without the knowledge of the American people for four years until it ended in 2017. The AFPI report highlights the issues with giving the federal government unfettered authority to access and censor Americans’ financial privacy and assets. Such unchecked power can have serious implications for individual freedom and autonomy.
Unchecked Power of the Federal Government
The AFPI report asserts that equipping the federal government with unchecked power, as a CBDC would potentially do, poses significant risks. This includes the ability to circumvent legal processes and potentially infringe upon Americans’ fiscal data and assets without proper oversight. Granting such broad authority to the government could have profound implications for privacy, autonomy, and overall financial security.
Doubts on the Federal Reserve’s Capacity
The report raises doubts about the Federal Reserve’s capacity to launch a CBDC, pointing to recent issues such as unprecedented inflation and major bank crashes. In the first half of 2023, the United States witnessed three of its largest bank failures. The AFPI authors argue that Congress, rather than the Federal Reserve, should have the authority to decide on the creation of a digital dollar. Given the recent challenges faced by the Federal Reserve, it is essential to ensure that the decision-making power rests with the appropriate legislative body.
Congressional Authority
The AFPI report urges Congress to assert its authority and decide on the creation of a digital dollar. It calls for the enactment of legislation that restricts both the creation and use of a CBDC. By delineating boundaries on the Federal Reserve’s scope to initiate a digital currency, Congress can ensure that privacy and autonomy are protected.
Advocacy for CBDC Ban
The report highlights various individuals and politicians who have advocated for a ban on CBDCs. U.S. Congressman Warren Davidson has been vocal about the need to prohibit CBDCs, emphasizing their potential threat to America’s fintech future. Presidential hopeful Vivek Ramaswamy has also expressed concerns about CBDCs, labeling them as grave threats to individual liberty. Presidential candidates Robert F. Kennedy Jr. and Ron DeSantis have emerged as vocal detractors of CBDCs, vowing to prohibit their implementation.
To read more about how bitcoin helps your brain, click here!
Conclusion
In conclusion, the AFPI report acknowledges the potential benefits of emerging payment innovations but emphasizes that these advantages should not come at the expense of consolidating fiscal control under the Federal Reserve’s authority. The report calls on Congress to play a decisive role in determining the boundaries for the creation of a CBDC. It underscores the need to protect privacy and autonomy in the face of potential invasions by issuing guidelines that uphold these fundamental values.
Reader Engagement
What are your thoughts on the America First Policy Institute’s report regarding a Federal Reserve-issued CBDC? Share your opinions and insights on this subject in the comments section below.
Crypto makes you smarter. Click here and learn more about Bitcoin!
