Crypto Crisis Isn’t Systemic, iCapital’s Amoroso Says according to an interview on “Bloomberg Markets” with Anastasia Amoroso, iCapital’s chief investment strategist. She argues that the cryptocurrency crisis is not a systemic issue that will affect the broader market and economy. Amoroso points out that the exposure to crypto among US consumers is only around 10%, compared to the widespread home ownership and mortgage market in 2008. Additionally, she highlights that the banking exposure to crypto is still relatively small, with estimates of around nine billion dollars. While there may be losses in the venture capital community, Amoroso suggests that the risk is contained and focuses on how the crisis could dent sentiment around the tech industry.
In the interview, Amoroso expresses concern about the lack of transparency regarding leverage and packaging in the crypto system. Drawing parallels to the financial engineering seen in the 2008 crisis, she emphasizes the need to understand the potential depth of the crisis. Despite the significant decline in the cryptocurrency market cap from three trillion dollars to around 800 billion today, Amoroso explains that the losses are not as widely distributed as in previous crises. Ultimately, she concludes that although there are exposures, the crisis is unlikely to have a cascading effect on the broader market.
Introduction
Cryptocurrency has been in the spotlight recently due to its volatile nature and the concerns about its potential impact on the financial system. Many people are worried that the recent decline in the value of cryptocurrencies signals a crisis that could have widespread and long-lasting effects. However, according to experts at iCapital, a leading global financial technology platform, the crypto crisis is not systemic and should not be a cause for alarm.
Video by Bloomberg Technology
In a recent video by Bloomberg Technology, iCapital’s Chief Investment Officer, Ed Amoroso, discussed the cryptocurrency crisis and its potential impact on the financial system. Amoroso emphasized that the current decline in cryptocurrency values is not indicative of a systemic crisis, but rather a correction in an overheated market. He also highlighted the importance of understanding the differences between the cryptocurrency market and traditional financial markets.
Explanation of Cryptocurrency Crisis
The cryptocurrency crisis refers to the recent decline in the value of cryptocurrencies, such as Bitcoin and Ethereum. This decline has led to concerns about the stability of the financial system and whether it could have a systemic impact similar to the 2008 financial crisis. However, it is important to note that there are significant differences between the cryptocurrency market and the traditional financial markets, which mitigate the risk of a systemic crisis.
Lack of Systemic Impact
One key factor that distinguishes the cryptocurrency crisis from the 2008 financial crisis is the lack of systemic impact. While the decline in cryptocurrency values may have an effect on specific sectors or individuals, it is unlikely to have a widespread and long-lasting impact on the overall financial system. The cryptocurrency market is still relatively small compared to the traditional financial markets, and its participants are mainly retail investors and individual traders.
Comparison to the 2008 Financial Crisis
The 2008 financial crisis was primarily caused by the collapse of the housing market and the subsequent failure of major financial institutions. It had a cascading effect on the entire financial system, leading to a global recession and a significant loss of confidence in financial markets. In contrast, the cryptocurrency market is not closely linked to the traditional financial system and is not backed by any central authority or institution. Therefore, any decline in cryptocurrency values is unlikely to have a similar systemic impact.
This image is property of i.ytimg.com.
Exposures and Risks
While the cryptocurrency crisis may not be systemic, it is essential to understand the exposures and risks associated with this market. These exposures can be categorized into individual, banking, and corporate exposures, each with its unique set of risks.
Individual Exposures
Individuals who invest in cryptocurrencies are exposed to the volatility and market risks associated with this asset class. The value of cryptocurrencies can fluctuate significantly, leading to potential losses for individual investors. However, these exposures are limited to the individuals who have chosen to invest in cryptocurrencies, and their impact on the overall financial system is relatively small.
Banking Exposures
Banks and other financial institutions that are involved in cryptocurrency trading may have exposures to this market. However, the exposures of banks to cryptocurrencies are generally limited due to regulatory constraints and risk management practices. Banks are required to hold sufficient capital to cover potential losses from their cryptocurrency exposures, reducing the risk of a significant impact on their financial stability.
Corporate Exposures
Some corporations have also invested in cryptocurrencies or blockchain technology. However, their exposures to the cryptocurrency market are typically small compared to their overall business operations. In most cases, these companies have diversified portfolios and can absorb any potential losses from their cryptocurrency investments without significant financial distress.
Impact on Tech Sector
The cryptocurrency crisis has also had an impact on the tech sector, particularly in relation to venture capital (VC) funding and risk appetite.
VC Community and Crypto Expansion
In recent years, the VC community has been actively investing in the cryptocurrency and blockchain space, fueling innovation and expansion in this sector. However, the recent decline in cryptocurrency values has led to a slowdown in VC funding and a reevaluation of risk appetite. Many investors are being cautious and shifting their focus towards more traditional tech companies, which has resulted in a tightening of funding for cryptocurrency startups.
Slowdown in VC Funding and Risk Appetite
The slowdown in VC funding and risk appetite can have broader implications for the tech sector as a whole. It may limit the availability of capital for early-stage startups, potentially stifling innovation and growth in the industry. However, it is important to note that the tech sector is highly diversified, and the impact of the cryptocurrency crisis may vary across different segments and companies.
Linkages to Other Tech Companies
The cryptocurrency crisis can also have indirect linkages to other tech companies that are not directly involved in the cryptocurrency market. As the tech sector becomes more interconnected, the decline in funding for cryptocurrency startups may have spillover effects on other companies that rely on these startups for partnerships, technology collaborations, or competitive dynamics.
This image is property of assets.bwbx.io.
Concerns about Leverage and Packaging
One of the main concerns about the cryptocurrency market is the lack of transparency in terms of leverage and packaging. These concerns have led to comparisons with collateralized debt obligations (CDOs), which played a significant role in the 2008 financial crisis.
Lack of Transparency
The lack of transparency in the cryptocurrency market makes it difficult to accurately assess the leverage and packaging of cryptocurrencies. This lack of transparency increases the risk of market manipulation and exposes investors to potential losses. However, it is important to note that efforts are being made to improve transparency in the cryptocurrency market, such as the development of regulatory frameworks and increased enforcement actions against fraudulent activities.
Comparisons to CDOs in 2008
The comparisons with CDOs in 2008 are not entirely accurate, as the underlying assets in the cryptocurrency market are fundamentally different from the mortgage-backed securities that fueled the financial crisis. CDOs were based on risky mortgages, whereas cryptocurrencies are decentralized digital assets. However, the concerns about leverage and packaging highlight the need for transparency and investor protection in the cryptocurrency market.
Containment and Systemic Impact
Despite the concerns surrounding the cryptocurrency market, there are factors that contribute to the containment of any potential systemic impact.
Gauge of Stress and Exposures
Market participants and regulators closely monitor the level of stress and exposures in the cryptocurrency market. Various indicators and metrics are used to assess the health of the market and identify potential risks. These monitoring efforts help to contain any potential impact and provide early warning signals in the event of a crisis.
Comparison to Other Market Declines
The cryptocurrency market is not the first market to experience a decline in value. History has shown that markets go through cycles of booms and busts, and the technology sector is no exception. The dot-com bubble in the late 1990s and the housing market crash in 2008 are examples of other market declines that were contained and did not cause a systemic crisis. Similarly, the cryptocurrency crisis is expected to be contained and not have a widespread impact on the financial system.
Concentration of Exposures in VC Funding
While the cryptocurrency market is relatively small, its impact on the financial system can be amplified through VC funding. Although VC investments in cryptocurrencies are a small portion of the overall VC market, any significant losses from these investments can potentially affect the broader tech sector. Therefore, monitoring the concentration of exposures in VC funding is crucial to containing the impact of the cryptocurrency crisis.
This image is property of assets.bwbx.io.
Insulation of Banks and Institutional Investors
Banks and institutional investors are relatively insulated from the risks and exposures associated with cryptocurrencies, further indicating that the crypto crisis is not systemic.
Limited Participation of Banks
Banks have been cautious in their exposure to cryptocurrencies due to regulatory constraints and risk management considerations. These institutions are required to follow strict regulatory guidelines and hold sufficient capital to cover potential losses. This precautionary approach helps to insulate banks from any significant impact of the cryptocurrency crisis on their financial stability.
Limited Broad Participation of Institutional Investors
Institutional investors, such as pension funds and insurance companies, have also been relatively cautious in their participation in the cryptocurrency market. The lack of regulatory clarity, market volatility, and concerns about investor protection have deterred many institutional investors from entering this market. As a result, the overall exposures of institutional investors to cryptocurrencies are limited.
Majority of individuals not exposed to Venture Capital
Finally, it is important to note that the majority of individuals are not exposed to venture capital investments or the cryptocurrency market. The cryptocurrency market is primarily driven by retail investors and individual traders, while the broader population has limited direct exposure to this asset class. Therefore, any potential impact on the financial system from the cryptocurrency crisis is likely to be contained within the smaller subset of individuals actively participating in this market.
Conclusion
In conclusion, the cryptocurrency crisis should not be mistaken for a systemic crisis that will have long-lasting effects on the financial system. While the decline in cryptocurrency values may lead to individual and sector-specific impacts, the overall exposures and linkages to the broader financial system are relatively limited. Banks and institutional investors are well-insulated from the risks associated with cryptocurrencies, and the majority of individuals have minimal direct exposure to this market. It is essential to understand the unique characteristics of the cryptocurrency market and its differences from the traditional financial markets when assessing its potential impact on the financial system.
